(Note: If you are just starting to think about deploying Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6) or are still in the pre-planning phases of an IPv6 deployment, please review the Before you Begin article in the Deployment section. This will help you better understand the information provided below.)
This Overview of Lessons Learned article contains five major topics:
- Lessons learned by Organizations from countries around the world,
- Defense Research and Engineering Network (DREN) IPv6 Pilot lessons learned summaries
- DREN IPv6 Pilot lessons learned details,
- Recipients of DREN IPv6 Pilot lessons learned, and
- Lessons learned from protocol transitions prior to IPv4.
While not limited to the topic of deploying IPv6, the article 8 Lessons from 20 Years of Hype Cycles provides lessons that are relevant to the topic of deploying IPv6. Through repeated successful reuse, lessons learned become recognized as best practices that are known to produce good outcomes when followed. Some best practices are described in documents listed in the United States (US) IPv6 and IoT Policy, Guidance and Best Practices and Non-United States IPv6 and IoT Policy, Guidance and Best Practices articles in the General Information section. Additional best practices with an emphasis on security are described in documents in the IPv6 and IoT Security Best Practices article in the Security section.
1. Lessons learned by Organizations.
No attempt has been made to extract lessons learned by organizations that have deployed IPv6. Instead, references to original presentations, papers, studies, publications, and articles are referenced so that the lessons learned can be understood in context.
Materials referenced in this topic come from a wide variety of sources, including conference presentations, research papers, industry studies, commercial provider publications, and news media. These materials are grouped into ten subtopics:
- United States (US) Department of Defense (DoD) Organizations
- Other US Federal Government Organizations
- Networking Equipment Manufacturers, Services, and Customers
- IPv6 Internet Service Providers (ISPs)
- Academic Community
- Standards Development Organizations (SDOs) and Software Development Organizations (SWDOs)
- Non-commercial Organizations
- European and Asian IPv6 Communities
- Caribbean and Latin American Communities
- Australian IPv6 Community
- The Small Office/Home Office (SOHO)
Note: The majority of the transitions referenced in this topic were from an IPv4 (only) networking infrastructure to a dual-stack (both IPv6 and IPv4) networking infrastructure. However, a few transitions listed in subtopics 3 through 6 and subtopic 10 describe an IPv4 (only) networking infrastructure transition to an IPv6 (only) networking infrastructure.
Reports produced by the Offices of the Inspector Generals (OIG) or Government Accountability Offices (GAO) for various US government organizations referenced in the IPv6 and IoT Policy, Guidance and Best Practices article in the General Information section also sometimes provide lessons learned. The IPv6 Network Testing Results article in the Testing section provides some lessons learned while testing IPv6 networks. The SDN Lessons Learned, Training, and Testing article in the SDN Knowledge Base section provides some lessons learned while deploying Cloud Computing using IPv6-enabled Software Defined Networking virtualization technology.
Source | Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Air Force Network Integration Center |
2012 | How the Air Force is Flying Toward IPv6 |
|
2012 |
|
Applied Research Associates, Inc. |
2009 |
|
DREN |
2010 |
|
2015 |
||
Defense Threat Reduction Agency |
2013 |
|
United States Naval Academy (USNA) | 2008 | Lessons Learned in Transitioning from IPv4 to IPv6 |
1.2 Other US Federal Government Organizations.
Source | Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Department of Commerce (DoC) | 2006 | Technical and Economic Assessment of Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6) |
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) |
2018 |
EPA Committed to Finding a Workaround for Every IPv6 Challenge |
Federal Aviation Agency (FAA) |
2011 |
|
Federal IPv6 (Fedv6) Task Force |
quarterly |
on-going series of Face to Face (F2F) meetings (registration required) |
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) |
2007 |
Government Empowering and Embracing the Kickoff of IPv6 (G.E.E.K.V.6) Invitation |
2007 |
G.E.E.K.V.6 Day (slides 41-117) |
|
2015 |
||
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) |
2013 |
|
Office of Government Ethics | 2016 | OGE – IPv6 Deployment (Authentication Required) |
Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) |
2007 |
|
|
2012 |
1.3 Networking Equipment Manufacturers, Services, and Customers.
1.4 Internet Service Providers (ISPs).
Source | Date | Title |
---|---|---|
6NET colleges and universities (see Note below) |
2005 |
An IPv6 Deployment Guide (chapters 13-14) |
Brno University of Technology |
2011 |
Deploying IPv6 - practical problems from the campus perspective |
2012 |
Deploying IPv6 in University Campus Network - Practical Problems |
|
Carleton University |
2017 |
|
Georgian College |
2010 |
|
Imperial College of London | 2016 | IPv6 Deployment at Imperial |
Louisiana State University |
2013 |
|
2017 |
||
McGill University |
2017 |
|
Merit Network | 2018 | A Model For Advancing IPv6 Deployment In REN And Higher Ed Networks |
The IPv6-Only Network | ||
2021 | IPv6 Readiness Program Whitepaper (registration form to download the whitepaper) | |
Monash University |
2008 |
|
Monmouth University |
2017 |
|
Oxford University | 2010 | The State of the IPv6 Deployment |
Université Laurentienne |
2011 |
|
Universiy of Buffalo | 2018 | Agile Dual-Stack Approach to Campus-Wide IPv6 Roll Out |
University of Cambridge | 2019 | IPv6 at Cambridge |
University of Colorado, Denver |
2017 |
|
University of Hawaii |
2019 |
The IPv6-only Network: Building Networks with DNS64/NAT64/464XLAT (video available here) (click here for further details) |
U. Hawaii IPv6 Deployment Experiences | ||
University of Iowa | 2018 | Case Study: IPv6 at the University of Iowa |
University of Pennsylvania |
2018 |
Reexamining How We Build and Operate Networks |
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech) |
2011 |
IPv6 at Virginia Tech: Operational experiences from a large-scale production deployment |
2018 | An IPv6 Journey Two Decades in the Making | |
2023 | 25 Years of Production IPv6 Experience | |
Washington and Jefferson College |
2017 |
Note: The European 6NET project reported lessons learned by several colleges and universities, networking customers and ISPs of all sizes. The 6NET project began in 2002 and completed in Jun 2005, followed by the 6DISS project which completed in Sept 2007; followed by 6DEPLOY and 6DEPLOY-2 (www.6deploy.eu) which completed in Feb 2013. A more recent European IPv6 project was Governments Enabled with IPv6 (GEN6), which completed in May 2015. Deliverables and Presentations under the Publications tab of the GEN6 website provide additional material. The next European IPv6 project was IPv6 Framework for European Governments, which completed in 2018. Then came the European Union Internet Standards Deployment Monitoring Website project.
1.6 Standards Development Organizations (SDOs) and Software Development Organizations (SWDOs).
Date | Title | |
---|---|---|
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) |
2012 |
Experiences from an IPv6-Only Network Request for Comments (RFC) 6586 |
2012 |
||
2013 |
Guidance for Internet Content Providers and Application Service Providers RFC 6883 |
|
2016 | IPv4 Declared Historic draft-howard-sunset4-v4historic-00 | |
2017 |
IETF: End Work on IPv4 draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf-01 (proposed Sept 2017, withdrawn June 2018) |
|
2023 | IPv6 Deployment Status RFC 9386 | |
IETF Journal | 2008 | IPv6 Deployment: Lessons from the Trenches |
1.7 Non-commercial Organizations.
Source | Date | Title |
---|---|---|
American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) |
2010 |
|
2010 |
||
2016 |
IPv6 Success Stories From Companies That Have Done It (panel session highlights, full transcript and video) |
|
Asia Pacific Network Information Center (APNIC) |
2009 - 2013 |
IPv6 Transition Stories (presentations and videos from 14 organizations around the world) |
2017 | APNIC IPv6 Deployment | |
Canadian Internet Registration Authority (CIRA) | 2011 | IPv6 adoption experience & challenges from a ccTLD operator |
Internet SOCiety (ISOC) Deploy360 Programme/IPv6 |
2010 - 2017 |
IPv6 Case Studies from over 17 organizations around the world |
2018 |
State of IPv6 Deployment 2018 | |
Internet Systems Consortium (ISC) |
2012 |
IPv6 Migration: Some Lessons Learned (a video) |
National Telecommunications & Information Administration (NTIA) |
2016 |
Incentives, Benefits, Costs, and Challenges to IPv6 Implementation (initial solicitation and numerous responses received from organizations around the world) |
San Joaquin Valley Library System | 2019 | Library Framework Setup for IPv6 |
Wikipedia |
On-going |
1.8 European and Asian IPv6 Communities.
Source | Date | Title |
---|---|---|
6NET networking customers and ISPs (see Note following 1.5 Academic Community category above) |
2005 |
An IPv6 Deployment Guide (chapter 12) |
Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) | 2021 | BEREC public technical workshop on IPv6 deployment across Europe |
Clara.net ISP |
2007 |
|
2009 |
||
Heise Online |
2011 |
|
Government of India, Ministry of Communications & Information Technology, Department of Telecommunications | 2014 | Compendium on IPv6 Based Solutions/Architecture/Case Studies for Different Industry Verticals |
IPv6 Framework for European Governments (see Note following 1.5 Academic Community category above) | 05/2018 09/2018 10/2018 |
Workshop 1: Identifying barriers to IPv6 Adoption (see also this 2003 presentation) Workshop 2: (cancelled) Workshop 3:: Overcoming barriers to IPv6 Adoption Workshop 4:: Lessons Learned and Next Steps |
Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Information Sharing Platform Laboratories |
2011 |
|
Qatar Communications Regulatory Authority | 2021 | Qatar: a model for IPv6 Adoption |
Swedish Post and Telecom Agency |
2012 |
Deploying IPv6 – Internet Protocol version 6 – Practical guidance |
Telecom Italia ISP |
2011 |
1.9 Caribbean and Latin American Communities
Source | Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Cable & Wireless (C&W) Communications |
2018 |
Enabling Internet Access Services over IPv6 in the Caribbean |
1.10 Australian IPv6 Community
Source | Date | Title |
---|---|---|
FX Networks ISP |
2011 |
|
Internode ISP |
2011 |
|
Internet Society of Australia |
2007 |
|
2006-2013 |
IPv6 for e-Business (website) |
1.11 The Small Office/Home Office (SOHO).
Operating System | Date | Title |
---|---|---|
agnostic (networking emphasis) |
2016 |
|
BSD/Linux/Apple OS X/ Microsoft Windows |
2009 |
IPv6 for All (chapters 2 and 3) |
Linux |
2006 |
|
2010 |
||
2010 |
||
2013 |
||
Linux/Apple OS X/Microsoft Windows |
2017 |
2. DREN IPv6 Pilot lessons learned summaries. If you want to discover the lessons learned by the DREN dual-stack pilot during the 2003 through 2014 time period, without having to read through the detailed articles that comprise the majority of the IPv6 Knowledge Base, you have four choices:
- This presentation and accompanying white paper provides an executive overview of the DREN IPv6 Pilot. They describe challenges overcome by the DREN IPv6 Pilot.
- This article provides a mid-level review of the DREN IPv6 Pilot and lessons learned during its deployment of IPv6: DREN IPv6 Pilot — 3 years of IPv6 in the real world. This covers the history, organization, processes, and results of the DREN IPv6 Pilot as of 2006. It discusses the reasons for the success of the DREN IPv6 Pilot, and provides some details (elapsed time, hours, dollars, training) for how “success” was measured (metrics). If you are really in a hurry and only have time to look at a couple of slides, then look at slides 44-47.
- This presentation provides a mid-level assessment of the DREN IPv6 Pilot lessons learned as of 2014.
- In a series of briefings started in 2005 and continuing through 2012, more specific technical lessons learned summaries have been presented at the Internet2 Joint Techs workshops. Those briefings are available here in the “Various Presentations” section of the DREN IPv6 Backbone website (archived 2012).
3. DREN IPv6 Pilot lessons learned details. The six sections that follow the Deployment section (IP Transport, Infrastructure, Network Management, Security, Applications, and Testing) contain articles providing more detailed descriptions of the lessons learned by DREN as well as by numerous other organizations while deploying IPv6, together with informal guidelines and aides to help in deploying IPv6.
4. Recipients of DREN IPv6 Pilot lessons learned. Lessons learned have been provided by the DREN IPv6 Pilot to other organizations through conference presentations, participation in numerous DoD, Service, and other Federal organizations' working groups, and in response to questionnaires received from commercial companies and Federal organizations.
- OMB Enterprise Architecture (EA) Success Story: This information was provided to the Office of Management and Budget in response to a request and was subsequently published on their website.
- RAND survey: This information was provided to the RAND Corporation in response to a request and was subsequently incorporated into a report entitled “Security Challenges to the Use and Deployment of Disruptive Technologies”. (See Chapter 6)
- RTI International survey: Information was provided to the RTI International corporation in preparing a report for the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) entitled “Department of Commerce Planning Report 05-2, IPv6 Economic Impact Assessment Final Report”, and also used in preparing a paper entitled “Could IPv6 Improve Network Security? And, If So, at What Cost?”.
- v6Transition survey: Information was provided to the v6Transition corporation in response to a request and was subsequently incorporated into a report entitled “Vol. 1: A Guide for Federal Agencies Transitioning to IPv6″. This report was the first in a series of 4 volumes published during 2006 through 2008. That series is available by going here and then clicking on World Report Series.
5. Lessons learned from protocol transitions prior to IPv4. Networks used other protocols prior to IPv4. A comprehensive summary of lessons learned during earlier protocol transitions was provided by Tony Hain here. Two important IETF RFCs specific to the transition to IPv4 are RFC 801 ”NCP/TCP Transition Plan” and RFC 942 “Transport Protocols for Department of Defense Data Networks.” They discuss basic issues and provide a few warnings against tempting shortcuts. A retrospective article on the shortcomings of the Network Control Protocol (NCP) is available. (Caution: Published on April Fools' Day, 2011!).